Have a theological question?

Romans 9 – 11.

There is a burning question beneath the surface of Paul's letter to the Romans, and it is one of the most important questions in all of Scripture: if most of Israel has rejected the Messiah, has God's word to Israel failed? This is not a small concern.

If God's covenant promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob could simply evaporate because of Israel's unbelief, then what confidence could anyone, whether Jew or Gentile, have in any promise God has ever made?

So, in Romans 9-11, after eight chapters of glorious gospel theology, Paul pauses to write what may be the most sustained meditation on God's faithfulness anywhere in the New Testament. God’s faithfulness to Israel in Romans is a story of steadfast love that survives human unbelief, judgment, and delay.

His answer to the question “Has God rejected his people?” is a resounding “By no means,” and that reply anchors the whole devotional vision of Romans 9-11. Romans does not treat Israel’s story as a mistake or a divine detour. It presents Israel as the people through whom God revealed his promises, and it insists that those promises still matter because God’s character has not changed.

The deepest comfort of Romans is not that Israel remained faithful, but that God remained faithful when Israel did not. This is the language of steadfast love: love that is not blown away by failure, history, or opposition.

Paul opens chapter 9 with words that startle us with their rawness: "I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my kinsmen according to the flesh" (Roms 9:2-3). This is not academic theology.

This is a man weeping over his own people. And yet Paul immediately reminds himself and us, of what belongs to Israel: "the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises" (Roms 9:4). These were not revoked.

Paul’s logic is simple but profound: if God could abandon his chosen people after making covenant promises, then no promise would be secure. But Romans says the opposite, God’s gifts and calling are irrevocable. They were given, and gifts from God are not casually withdrawn.

Paul's grief is precisely the grief of someone who believes the promises are real and true, which is why Israel's unbelief wounds him so deeply. Paul's first move is to clarify what the promise to Israel actually was; "It is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel" (Roms 9:6).

From the beginning, God's purposes ran through a remnant within Israel, Isaac, not Ishmael; Jacob, not Esau. This was never a failure of God's promise; it was the shape of the promise all along. God's faithfulness was never tied to the obedience of every physical descendant of Abraham, but to His own sovereign, electing purpose.

This truth, hard as it is, becomes a foundation rather than a threat.

If God's faithfulness depended on human faithfulness, none of us, Jew or Gentile, would have hope. But because it rests on God's own character and promise, it cannot be shaken by anyone's unbelief, including Israel's. Paul does not answer the Israel question in abstraction.

He points to himself: he is an Israelite, from the tribe of Benjamin, and yet he has received mercy and a calling in Christ (Roms 11:1).

In other words, Paul’s own conversion is evidence that God has not cast away his people. That matters devotionally because it means divine faithfulness is not merely a doctrine; it is a lived reality. The God who pursued Paul also continues to work within Israel, preserving a remnant and keeping the story open.

Even when the visible picture looks small, God’s covenant purpose has not failed. Paul then turns from God's sovereignty to Israel's responsibility. He describes their zeal, "a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge" (Roms 10:2), and their failure to submit to God's righteousness in Christ, seeking instead to establish their own.

Yet even here, Paul does not write Israel off. He insists that the gospel is still "to the Jew first" (Roms 1:16), and he prays earnestly for their salvation (Roms 10:1). Then comes the question that gives the whole argument its hinge: "I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means!" (Roms 11:1). There is, even now, a remnant chosen by grace.

Paul's most vivid image arrives in Roms 11:17-24: the olive tree. Some natural branches, the unbelieving Israel, have been broken off, and wild branches, believing Gentiles, have been grafted in, contrary to nature, but by grace alone.

The grafting image shows that Gentile inclusion is not a replacement of Israel but an overflow of the same mercy that first came through Israel. But Paul warns Gentile believers against arrogance: "do not be arrogant toward the branches … if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will He spare you" (Roms 11:18, 21).

And then the breathtaking promise: "And even they, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again" (Roms 11:23). Paul calls this a mystery: a partial hardening has come upon Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in, "and in this way all Israel will be saved" (Roms 11:25-26).

The church lives as a beneficiary of Israel’s promises, not as a rival claimant. Whatever the precise contours of this future, the heart of it is unmistakable: Israel's story is not finished. God is not done with Israel.

The theological centre of this whole section is verse 29: "For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable." This single sentence carries enormous weight. It tells us something essential about who God is, not merely about Israel. The God who calls does not take back His calling because of human failure. The God who gives does not rescind His gifts because the recipient stumbles.

This is the same God who justifies the ungodly, who keeps those He has predestined, who works all things together for good for those who love Him (Roms 8:28-30). Israel's story in Romans 9-11 is not a side issue, it is a case study in the unshakeable faithfulness of God toward His own promises.

For devotion, this means we learn to read God’s dealings with history through the lens of mercy. God does not merely react to human stubbornness; He weaves even resistance into a larger redemptive purpose. His faithfulness is not fragile, and his love is not threatened by delay.

If you have ever wondered whether your own failures could cause God to abandon His promises to you, Romans 9-11 answers with Israel as the proof: God's faithfulness does not rise and fall with ours. He keeps His word not because we are worthy, but because He is faithful.

Paul cannot end this section with an argument. He can only end it with worship: "Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and how inscrutable His ways!… For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be glory forever. Amen" (Roms 11:33, 36).

The same God who has not forgotten His covenant with Israel has not forgotten His covenant with you in Christ. His gifts are not contingent on your perfection. His calling does not waver with your weakness. This also teaches patience. We often want immediate resolution, but Romans teaches that God’s faithfulness may unfold over time, through remnant, grafting, mercy, and mystery.

What looks like silence may be preservation; what looks like loss may be preparation for a wider display of grace. Rest in a faithfulness that is not yours to maintain, but His to keep.

About Coram Deo

Coram Deo — before the face of God. This blog reflects on Scripture, world events, science, music, psychology, and the human mind — always through the lens of Christian faith. All of life is lived before the face of God.